Which is better for TomTom one. FAT or FAT32?

[DeeVine]

Title says it all . So which is better?

 

[no clue]

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/reskit/core/fncc_fil_blpd.mspx?mfr=true
________
PORTABLE VAPOURIZERS

 

[digital-flex]

I can tell you from my experience that FAT is better than FAT32.

When I purchased my new SD Card, it was a FAT32 filesystem. I copied all my files and booted up TomTom. It works fine but a very noticeable speed degradation. When I tapped on a icon on the menu, it took about 3-5 second delay. I tolerated this for about 2 days and switched back to FAT. I can tell you, no delay whatsoever.

 

[Wiley]

The card that came with my TT1 v2 was/is formatted FAT

FAT is where it's at! You give up a little room on the card when you use FAT, but the compatibility with small, embedded o/s devices like a GPS, digital camera or MP3 player, will more than make up for the difference.

 

[farmecologist]

FAT works better for me too.

 

[DeeVine]

ok guys, thankx a lot. Seems that FAT is faster

 

[lec510]

I currently use a 4G card, FAT32 is the only option, when I gave it a try (FAT) few moment ago.

 

[futruballa]

Fat only supports up to 2gb. You have to use Fat32 with larger SD cards.