- Joined
- Nov 2, 2007
- Messages
- 15
- TomTom Model(s)
- TT One V2
Hey, guys. Haven't been to the forum for awhile... any updates on when or if Navcore 8 will be available for my TomTom One V2? Thanks.
oh great... and the ONE V2 had the shortest lifetime compared to the GO 300 and the Classic. Looks like i'll stick with my old maps then.
so basically all i can do now is upgrade to 7.25 and stay there until I want to upgrade the unit itself? dang it.. should've taken advantage of the sale.Not really as USA & Canada map v7.25 is equivalent to NA v8.10 without IQ routing and ALG that make the map too large to fit internal memory of all ONE models.
so basically all i can do now is upgrade to 7.25 and stay there until I want to upgrade the unit itself? dang it.. should've taken advantage of the sale.
Not really as USA & Canada map v7.25 is equivalent to NA v8.10 without IQ routing and ALG that make the map too large to fit internal memory of all ONE models.
But all the roads are there? well except the minor minor ones that I know the NA map will have but the USA_and_Canada one won't
... some deletion...
Honestly, I would love to use the 725 if it included IQ routes and ALG only because the 725 map contains less details, which would allow the device to run faster.
On the ONE XL, I know that if I disabled all of the POI's shown on map and features, the map would refresh pretty quickly on the screen. The one XL has a 200MHz processor. The 720 has a 400MHz processor, but won't necessarily run faster since the 810 maps are full of that detail which only bog up system resources in my opinion.
The lower detail aspect of ONE models is a matter of limited storage capacity of 1GB of internal memory not of processor speed. Remember that you have more than the map to fit in 1GB, you also need NavCore, sounds, voices, screens etc. On GO models, you also have to process multimedia, tts, vr which tax the processor. On the XL-S you have 64MB of RAM (vs 32MB on XL) to compensate having to process tts.
I never said anything about the difference in between both maps being only processor speed. The map is obviously bigger on the GO because of my reasons I mentioned before, more detail, larger POI database, alg, etc. My point is that my double speed processor is not making anything noticibly faster since my device has to operate more BS, INCLUDING a more detailed map. Try running "Operate my ONE XL-S" on your PC and see how smooth it runs. Also see how much % of a core it takes up on your PC.
I now await a counter-argument from you Gilbert like you do to ALL of my posts.
Stareeeeeeeeeeeee intooooooooo my red eyesssssssssssssssss![]()
ahh alright. I'll just wait for a map sale I guess.Nah, like Gilbert said, you'll be alright. I don't think you'll have less roads with the 725 maps. 810 maps manily have small luxory features. As far as the roads, you should be perfectly fine. I used 725 map on my ONE XL when I had it and it did GREAT!
Honestly, I would love to use the 725 if it included IQ routes and ALG only because the 725 map contains less details, which would allow the device to run faster.
On the ONE XL, I know that if I disabled all of the POI's shown on map and features, the map would refresh pretty quickly on the screen. The one XL has a 200MHz processor. The 720 has a 400MHz processor, but won't necessarily run faster since the 810 maps are full of that detail which only bog up system resources in my opinion.
I kinda compare it to an old computer with XP which runs fast vs. windows vista which requires alot faster hardware, only for it to run the same speed as the old xp machine.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.