Welcome to TomTomForums.com - TomTom, GPS Navigation Community Mark forums read | View Forum Leaders
TomTomForums.com - TomTom, GPS Navigation Community



TomTom ONE/START/EASE/XL/XXL News, information and discussion on the TomTom ONE / START / EASE / XL / XXL.


Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
TomTom One IQ Routes - great hardware - terrible software!
 
 
mvl mvl is online now
Super Moderator

Reply With Quote
mvl will become famous soon enoughmvl will become famous soon enoughmvl will become famous soon enoughmvl will become famous soon enoughmvl will become famous soon enoughmvl will become famous soon enough
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 3,508
07-06-2009, 07:34 PM
 
Perhaps (only a guess here) there are problems running USB2 on a 266mhz processor. Tomtom had USB2 support for a few years on its 400hmz chips (GO models), but none of its 266mhz models (usually ONE/XL) had USB2.

I don't remember any old pentium 266mhz with USB2 either.
__________________
Current Tomtoms:

GO 740 app 9.054 (weekdays)
Map North America 2GB 855 + full POI + map subscription
+ LIVE services

GO 930 app 8.302 (weekends)
Map North America 855 + map subscription
Map WCE_2GB 825
+ PLUS traffic + Fuel prices + free safety cameras

HOME 2.7.4.1962 - WinXPproSP3

Prior Tomtoms:
Go 720, Go 510, One Limited Edition, One 2nd edition (all sold)

Last edited by mvl; 07-07-2009 at 06:34 AM.. Reason: grammar
 
 
 
 
TomTom Newbie
Mansn's Avatar

Reply With Quote
Mansn is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 9
07-06-2009, 10:53 PM
 
Hmmm, I don't think that's the issue, seeing that you can get way slower hardware with USB 2.0 support. My Cowon iAudio 5 for example sported a Sigmatel STMP 3520 chipset running at a whopping 75 Mhz and it still supported USB 2.0. ( Spec Sheet )

The problem I think is that TomTom hasn't actually changed the One series internally at all in the last 5 years and have just been building on the same platform, possibly shrinking the size of internal components and releasing better, smarter firmware for the devices with much better maps. I just think it's a shame that it only has USB 1.1, as I am sure that the memory inside the unit is capable of far higher speeds. Because of this backing up the device and installing things to it takes 1 hour (500 KB/s) instead of 4 minutes (10 MB/s). My little USB thumb drive (Super Talent Pico) can transfer files at roughly 20-25 MB/s and that has no CPU inside it to speak of. Just a memory controller that costs no more than a few 10s of cents to actually include in a product for any manufacturer who is ordering 10000 of them.
 
 
 
 
TomTom Newbie
Mansn's Avatar

Reply With Quote
Mansn is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 9
07-06-2009, 10:54 PM
 
Oh, I forgot to mention. I managed to download and install the maps without corrupting them on the way. I think someone must have seen the 10 anonymous error reports that were sent off and fixed something on their servers.

Thanks for your help guys!

Now all I need to be truly happy is a good Arnold Schwarzenegger voice for my TomTom.

"GET OFF DE HIGHVAY!"
 
 
 
 
TomTom User
CynicX's Avatar

Reply With Quote
CynicX is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 196
07-08-2009, 08:55 PM
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansn View Post
In regard to the original title of my post. After finding out that the device is actually USB 1.1 I think I have to revise my statement that the hardware is "great". Seeing that USB 1.1 was released in 1998 and USB 2.0 is from 2000 the fact that a device released in 2009 has such old tech in it is kind of horrifying.
Yep, its seems when you buy the cheaper model of anything there are compromises. It would be nice to live in a world where the ONLY difference between a more expensive model and a less expensive model was the price. Unfortunately I'm restricted to this world...reality....where more expensive = better, less expensive = worse....

heheh j/k. However in tomtom defense its obviously a way to save on cost and pass that on to the consumer. AND as long as everything is operating properly there is only the MAX of 4 large downloads (maps) per year. Unlike your Cowon which probably sees a lot more data transfer...

Last edited by CynicX; 07-08-2009 at 08:58 PM..
 
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
Latest Threads
- by torema
- by JustJoe
- by neinome


Partner Links



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:57 AM.